"Love your neighbor as yourself"
Matthew 22:39
There are ethical principles (1) that are classified as "basic" connected to a person in a social group. Among them, we can name:
Autonomy principle means that any adult and mentally healthy person is moral (it makes the distinction between good and evil) which has the right to determine and lead his life with him - even the way it sees fit without being deprived of living a plain and self-determined life. Only the person so intimately knows what is she to judge its condition, its location, its capabilities, its limitations, its power and its potential to develop. This principle allows to make informed choices.
Equality principle states that all men are equal, that all have the same rights and have the same obligations. Thus, we conform a human family. The Kantian axiom: "Do not do to others what you do not want others do unto you" said strict reciprocity in human relations. It requires a way of thinking and living. It is opposed to discrimination by religion, language, gender, ethnic-cultural origin (2), sexual orientation, disability, age, race (3).
Discrimination has by objective cancel and reduce the merit, enjoyment, exercise rights and fundamental freedoms of persons in the political, economic, social and cropping.
Humanization principle: states that every human being should live, act and promote human values such as freedom, conscience, social sense or responsibility. This principle calls us to become daily more human day, to become a person, by distancing us from the natural man (selfish and arrogant) and animal (subject has its primary drives and instincts).
Solidarity principle: states that whoever lives in human society, the obligation to seek the common good and be attentive and helpful with the needs of others. It follows directly from the social nature of man, so this principle also teaches that all other previously cited.
Solidarity gives meaning and purpose has humanity: it is directed immediately to the service of others. "Everyone should contribute to the common good according to their means. Everyone has the right to receive from others all that he needs to live and grow and if for some reason it can not acquire by itself "expresses this magnanimous principle. This right implies a duty, as the case turns to parents, families, intermediate associations and, finally, has the state.
Thus, a poor person who has an unmet need which can not satisfy by any limitation, a hindrance has his will or lack of personal resources, has the right to be assisted by state organizations. If the person is deprived of this assistance, it is the system that takes advantage of the person.
This principle of solidarity has the duty to do justice, participation, freedom and fairness. Each person contributes their true ability in his work, his knowledge, respect for civil standards, its economic contribution through taxes, through research and the promotion of well directed to nature, the environment, as well as to others . This includes not only the obligation to meet the needs of all involved if the duty to improve the living conditions of the whole society.
The principle of subsidiarity is trying to balance the unequal relations people-person, person-society person and state. Obviously, in these stratifications there are differences of abilities, skills and a need for complementarity. This principle advocates for further action and between auxiliary social organizations to promote the independence of people and ascending form in self-sufficiency.
The state, in ultimate instance, should the permanent provider requirements for personal achievement that involved giving citizens spaces of freedom, independence, participation and initiative. Also, the State must grant their ability to reason, judge, evaluate, analyze, compare, criticize, among other necessary intellectual operations has any social evolution.
The government and intermediary organizations give to man the right to be his own development officer and a citizen change agent to advance, ultimately, the national collective. Recognizes the freedom, dignity and individual responsibility, not to mention his own responsibility to the citizens.
Logically, the person is supported and recognized by all rights by the State and by any social group. Man should not suffer atrophy or slavery by the company or by its systems.
Any State, group totalitarian system or deny this principle and try to maintain its hegemony by canceling the individual citizen competence to decide for yourself.
These groups look like medieval authorities who have the power to order, think, decide and do so with impunity asymmetrically (protected by his macabre relations based on old social roots) and all others members of society must obey them without ask no questions. These groups are headed by without paying any ear. They perform a fake situational diagnosis, that is to say deliberately prevaricating reality because it displeases them and plays against their interests.
This attitude that despises the personal dignity and reduces or cancels civil rights, human rights and stifles citizen voice. Subordinates fall on oppression and discredit, among other strategies of disenchantment. It is this lack of love that creates a society of blind and deaf who set themselves up to lead to population must lead seagull.
Selfishness, jealousy, fear, pride is the mother of immorality. This prevents the advance of real society. Thus, poverty (material, spiritual, cultural, human), excluding those systems has hands of individuals, ignorance, disease, drug abuse, discrimination result there, all silenced the population, that becomes vulnerable, embodies the anguish, anxiety, frustration by many unjust taxation.
The real diagnosis material, economic, social, cultural and basic health are essential to determine if or not enjoyment of human rights in everyday life (4).
All these principles based 'a democracy and are present in the law and social ethics with the fallout of Professional ethics. They object has the aristocracy, authoritarian despotism has subordination and has to oppression from elitist groups detriment individual well, the social common good and the culture of citizenship and individual participation in every situation is concerned (consent principle).
All men of principles to guide them but they are not always ethical. It is good for each of us to think about all this and make awareness, trying to identify if we are moral or immoral and its direct impact on our lives, on others and on society.
It seems easier to express some common ethical principles: "respect all human beings," "do not use violence," "help people in need," but it is not easy to behave following the speech.
By the review of individual and collective consciousness, every human being and every company is able to determine what is harmful for him and for society.
Accordingly, it is possible to avoid that is immoral, that is to say everything that goes against no malice, charity, beneficence, justice, autonomy , peace.
Personal experience, family, and the groupal national historical and international help us in this necessary awareness to not repeat the sad events, to find ourselves in conflict situations, to draw us from negative. That's the story that we reported on the pride, selfishness, immorality men, love for power and money with its devastating consequences on human life and the planet .
Breach ethical principles attracts immediate consequence misfortune, and other sanctions on the principle disobeys. Following analysis, we can see that ethical principles are based on one or more spiritual or religious laws, if you want to call them. When the ethical principle coincides with a law (née legal prescriptive standard of a legitimate authority), it commits a crime leading to legal sanction. For all this, the importance of awareness-based access has information and has education, has disclosure and 'a denunciation of all civic duties. Man is the product of his education.
Notes
(1) The principles are characterized by the absoluteness of their claims, the universality of its validity and the immutability of its content (Garcia de Alba, Juan Manuel. Professional Ethics, pp 179-180).
(2) Differential treatment, excluding restrictive and based on morals, habits, customs, clothing, symbology, lifestyle, sense of belonging, language, accent and beliefs.
(3) skin color, facial facial features, height, weight, hair color, eye color.
(4) Boleso, Héctor Hugo. (2005). Protección internacional de los derechos humanos. Revista Derecho y cambio social numero 04. Retrieved 11-03-16 http://www.derechoycambiosocial.com/revista004/CARATULA.htm
Consulted Bibliography
Ahlert, Alvori. (2007). Ética y derechos humanos: principios educaioinales para una sociedad Democràtica. Revista Polis. Retrieved 11-03-16 https://polis.revues.org/4663#authors
Dhondt, Urban. (1961). Foundations of social ethics. Revue Philosophique de Louvain. Retrieved 11-03-16 http://www.persee.fr/doc/phlou_0035-3841_1961_num_59_63_5086
Pastor-Palomar, Nuria. (2006). El principio y su of subsidiariedad incidencia en el respeto los Derechos Master por la Uniòn Europea. Universidad de Navarra. Retrieved from -03 to 16 http://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/23554/1/ADI_XXII_2006_14.pdf
Molfino Urbina, Francisco Javier. (2005). El principio de subsidiariedad, plus fundamentos y su funcion in the Sociedad Democrática. `Revista de Derecho y Humanidades. 11-03-16 http://www.derechoyhumanidades.uchile.cl/index.php/RDH/article/download/17070/17796 recovered.
All rights reserved on text © CECILIARE , 2016.
